Friday, December 18, 2009

Response Essay "Princess Daisy"

Is anyone who has not been dreaming to belong to the high life of glamor and luxury? Of course everyone has been day-dreamer to this fancy world. Nowadays, it is generally admitted that a person who has plenty money can achieve his social classification and give precedence to dominate in society. Although, to reach on the top and succeed in life is necessary to look elegant and beautiful. Does really matter?
According with Judith Krantz in her text book “Princess Daisy” she believes that “being young, beautiful and rich is more desirable than being old, ugly and destitute”. She matches together the money and beauty necessarily of woman’s succeeding in life. Obviously, to be a beautiful woman with attractive appearance you can gain the attention of men. She concern that only beautiful woman deserves the high social class instead of ugly woman. Therefore, she mention about Princess Daisy of her text to point out the importance of the appearance of such a person who deserve to belong to the high class. Additionally, Krantz expresses her admiration in the high social life since her whole story is associated with capitalistic elements. She referred to the particular polo sport which is symbolizes the aristocratic status; because only the people who belong to high class can have the opportunity to play this sport. In addition, she give emphasizes in details while she describe that the menu has a brown and gold border in order to underline of the first class restaurant. She shows that she admire that she belong to the exclusiveness circle of plentitude materials.
All the above, Krantz declared her admiration to the capitalistic system as many people of the high social life do. This system is encourages private investment and includes integral part to thrive the economic growth.
On the contrary, Clive James through his book “A Blizzard of Tiny Kisses” is virtual judge her book in ironic manner because she show off the aristocracy life. Hence, in the beginning of his judgment, he said that “she deserves her high place in the best-seller lists” although he characterize that is “a terrible book and totally inept.” Clive raises his contradiction towards Krantz due to the fact that she gets enthusiasm with the exclusiveness of the upper class. Over his judgment he point out that the people should not show their intimacy because is concern with the aristocracy and glamor. Furthermore, Clive said that “Mrs Krantz has not enough humour to write tongue-in-check, but other people are perfectly capable of reading that way”; he emphasize that the particular book you might look at it with two perspectives. Therefore, the readers’ who are membership of the aristocracy life they will not look at it in ironic manner as she presents the glorious life. However, the readers who are not possessed to the high class they probably read the book in ironic way and despise it while are not familiar with this flashy world. Krantz’s literary writing has luck of humor as long as she describes the high class with not ironic consideration. Clive judge Krantz book with this manner because he represents the leftism doctrine. He regards the social change to become equal in terms of wealthy distribution rather than rule with the private property. Besides, he correlated his self feminist because he stands as woman’s defender. Despite the fact, a woman with not good looking is also deserved to belong to the high class. He totally disagrees with Krantz because she creates a snob image of the high social class. He believed that the intelligent people who are dreamers for this life should not obstruct them.
I agree at some extend with Clive that she spoil the ambition to the ordinary people into vague image for those who want to keep dreaming of this kind of life. On the other hand, I believe that a woman should be have a good looking but not necessarily beautiful. It’s a woman’s nature to care about she’s appearance. It is well known fact that many women who are celebrities such as singers, models, politician and journalists own to care and keep their selves appearances well. Many times I heard about that celebrities have made plastic surgery in order to look youngest and keep fit their selves. Although, Clive does not agree that women should do this things because the ordinary people may want to imitate them; because they represent their idol.
Ultimately, to be a wealthy or not is not really matter; but what is really essential is woman’s appearance because is integral part in their life. As Judith Krantz said “Every woman knows that a good clothes fantasy is the only thing to rival a good sexy fantasy”.

10 comments:

  1. Fotinie, your response essay has a very good structure and is understandable. Your introduction is very interesting because you impose us some questions in order to think about and this draw our attention from the early beginning in order to read the whole essay. I like the way you included quotes from the original essay in your response essay for supporting your beliefs. I think that this essay is not only ironic but is also funny because of the way and the language that the writer uses in describing this aristocratic life. My favorite phrase from your essay is your believe that ‘’ a woman should be have a good looking but not necessarily beautiful’’. This is very important because women can easily be judged by others because of her appearance. Even the society had crated an idea of representing the woman as beautiful idol mostly in advertisements.
    Moreover, I think that this essay is to point out with ironic and funny tone that the book ‘’ Princess Daisy’’ is not such a good book. There are many writes that got a story and revised it in their own way and this is very good in supporting this idea of revising books and you can achieve that by mentioning other writers who done the same with Clive James.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fotini,your essay has a structure and it's quite good.I see a few grammar and syntax mistakes that must be corrected.In the essay you explain what is written in the text - but I think you must write a bit more about what do you believe.Your argument is not very clear, since I see that a lot of the material and words are taken from the actual text.It would be better if you used your own words in order to support your ideas and arguments.Nevertheless, it was good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fotinie, firstly I liked the question you had used in the introduction and then you answer it, and analyze the point in some way. Also, I liked that you didn’t refer to the text at the introduction but at the main body. The way you have used linking words was correct to direct us in your essay and in your way of telling things. You correctly used quotation marks, but I would prefer if you had split your paragraphs to be more close to one another and not being very big and too small. Moreover at the conclusion I find it very good that you also talked for the technique and the tone of the writer, as well as you talked about the reader’s opinion. I loved your phrase “He regards the social class to become equal in terms of wealthy distribution rather than rule with the private property”. Despite some grammatical mistakes your essays was really good.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fotini, firstly I liked the fact that you started your essay with questions. Is a good method which draws the readers attention. I also saw some grammatical mistakes but after all we all do mistakes.
    Moreover, the structure of your essay is quite good since you introduse in every paragraph a different subject.
    Finally, in order to improve your essay I will agree with Melina which said that it is better to use your own words instead of using words from the book. However, it was a good essay.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fotini, your essay is very well structured and with good ideas.I liked the fact that you have started your essay with questions that you really got to the point. You have mentioned the book of Judith's Krantz as not ironic by supporting that women because of their high social class should have an appropriate beautiful appearance. Then you have mentioned what Cline James for Krantz which was a good contrast. And I agreed with you that James is ironic with her book, saying that all should be equal and not only the women of the high social class should look after their appearance. Moreover, you supported your essay with good ideas. We admitted that our appearance today is very important for us and for those who belonged to the high social class because their world is quite different, so they gave great importance to their looking. In my opinion, you should mention the situation we have in Cyprus,for example people from leftish or capitalistic side. I also liked the way you ended your essay, adding what Judith said. As women, we know that our appearance would always be our matter in society. All in all, It was a nice essay with great ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fotinie, I liked your essay but I would like to read in your revise your opinion of women in society. In your introduction you started by questioning the readers and it's a good way to draw them attention so to keep reading your piece. I noted some grammatical mistakes but I'm sure that you can improve it to your revise. Nevertheless it was good essay.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fotinie, I liked that in your essay you use both Clive James’s and Judith Krantz’s perspectives to support what you say at the introductory paragraph. As I realized, your position is somewhere in between these person’s way of seeing the world regarding the issues of money and beauty. Your essay is nicely structured but I would rather if you merge the second and the third paragraph. I also noticed some grammatical and syntactical mistakes. Correcting them will be something positive for your essay. I would also like to read a bit more about your opinion on the issue of money and beauty. My favourite part of your essay is the first sentence of the introductory paragraph. People who are not rich have certainly dreamed of how would their lives would be like if they were rich.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I thought that Fotinie introduced her argument rather well, since in the second sentence of her response essay, she asserted that the kind of issues that Krantz brings to light in her book, are those that women who ‘day-dream’ about living in a ‘fancy world’ often identify with. In the next couple of lines, Fotinie (while trying to make her point about how rich people can buy their way to the higher echelons of society) made quite a few syntactical errors. Fotinie then proceeded to interpret Krantz’ evident perspective that beauty and money are at the core survival within the wider domains of society. Much alike Vasia, Fotinie also mentioned that Mrs. Krantz’s ‘capitalist’ attitude towards the division of wealth (i.e. that beautiful females should have priority when accessing serious money and climbing up the social ladder), influences the nature of her text. Fotinie enlightens her readers with several examples of how the author positively portrays the notion of female accomplishment in combination with aristocracy (e.g. when referring to ‘Princess Daisy’/ ‘polo sport’/’gold border’ of first class restaurant’s menu), as part of her (Krantz’s) attempt to promote this very exclusiveness. Fotinie made the right decision to include a diverging perspective on the essence of glamour and elitism. I think the strongest part of Fotinie essay was when she contended that James regards the female author’s text which focused greatly on the upper classes, as lacking humour and irony “because he represents the leftist doctrine, ” but would have preferred it, if she (Fotinie) would have taken more of a moral stance at the end / conclusion of her essay instead of merely affirming that we should turn our backs to riches, since ‘what is really essential is a woman’s appearance [because it is an integral part in their life].’

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Fotinie,
    Your response essay was clearly written and well-formed. I liked the way you pased your paragraphs and how you increased them. The thing I wanted to note, is that you wrote too much in one paragraph and I think the aim is to to write the paragraphs you allow to but with 6-7 sentences on each paragraph.
    Your vocabulary was rich and you used plenty of beautiful words to fulfill your sentences. Good for you.
    Although, I've noticed some grammar mistakes which you shouldn't do, but am sure you didn't notice them while you were writing , for ex."he characterise", "he point out". Just becareful.
    Alao, I liked the way you explained luxury/glamour and social life. The way of your explanation was clearly enough in order to understand the whole point of the particular essay. Through my reading I liked the sentence, "It's a woman's nature to care about her appearance". You are so right and this is absolutely true, because is up to each women on how to be looked like or something.
    In a general view, your response essay was interested to be read and you analysed this "easy" essay really nice. Your writing skill seems to be a good writing, but you should look forward some title mistakes which are serious. After your revision, the essay will be even more better than now. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Fotinie I enjoyed reading your essay very much. As our classmates mentioned you did use a good structure to write your essay. It was a clear essay with an introduction where you introduce the main theme of the essay, for example when you said “although, to reach on the top and succeed in life is necessary to look elegant and beautiful”. A main body where you wrote one paragraph to say about Judith Krantz and what she believes, for example “ she concern that only that only beautiful woman deserves the high social class instead of ugly woman”. You also wrote another paragraph to express the opinion of Clive James based on the main theme that you mentioned in the introduction, for example “a woman with not good looking is also deserved to belong to the high social class”. These are the things that made your essay clear a good structured. Furthermore, although you have expressed your opinion in the two last paragraphs I would like to see more of your opinion through out the essay in order to make your essay more personal. Also, despite the fact that I liked your essay very much I think you have some grammatical mistakes that when they will be corrected they will make your essay even stronger and better.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.