A Blizzard of tiny kisses
Princess Daizy by Judith Krantz
Have you ever imagined living to high society’s world? If yes, would you prefer to have such an opulence in your life? Well, this is according to each person, his overview in life. To choose if he desires to deal with aristocratic life or just having a normal life. For some people there is a lot of dreaming and for others not. Through the high social class everything consider to be changeable, but first of all the appearance and the good - looking.
To begin with, Judith Krantz, the famous author of Princess Daizy book supports every department of the high - life. She is a capitalist lady that believes on aristocracy, especially having a lot of money. She deems that a young, beautiful and rich woman is more desirable rather being old, ugly and without money. She considers the female model, a woman that has money through her life, it is always appropriate to keep her own beauty. With her book ‘ Princess Daizy’ wants to bring out issues dealing with aristocracy, glamour , status and success. That every woman should keep this order in her life, to look for the bourgeois fancies of aristocracy. Through her work estimates the important issue of art. As Alex Witchel says , “ every woman knows that a good clothes fantasy is the only thing to rival a good sex fantasy.” For her, art is a good instrument for women. This art can give to her a nice appearance so that her beauty revealed. That’s why she gives so attention to her hero’s hair. This sounds ironic for someone who might read the book for a first time especially if he belongs to the low social class. But , people like Mrs. Krantz take it without this irony because they think with the mind of being in high social class. For Krantz, if you have the money, you can develop in such a situation.
In contrast with Cline James, who criticizes such an idea. From the beginning, he explores his ironic tone through Krantz’s book, Princess Daizy. He is a socialist man, who supports the other side that Krantz does. He criticizes her lack of literary weight by saying that there isn’t any sense through her book. He leaves his ironic tone to touch the entire book. That lower people will not think the life of high status in such a way.
He argues that all should be equal in life. Not only women who have the money deserve to have such a good appearance in society. To look always on their beauty. James, denies this idea by the view of a man. He identifies that women of high society give a fortune in order to engage an attractive appearance. For him, this is unacceptable. Aristocratic women may have the money but this does not mean that they put on surgeries, for instance to look younger.
However, considering the world today, it is appropriate for a woman to be herself in society. Every woman wants to keep her beauty in any way so that she will be attracted by men. By caring herself, it wins a lot of confidence and looks comfortable through her appearance. She wants to adapt her own image in society. Living in the modern world, in the world where everything happened. Specifically, in the latest sector of technology which has it’s own miracles through. For those who have the money and really want to change something for their appearance, technology is a solution. Concentrating on woman’s world , her appearance take the most important role in society. In Cyprus, there are such instances. Especially, important women who belong to the department of high social class, such as women in politics or even women who their husbands have an authority position in society. These women should always look nice and still remain their beauty even though they may interest on having a surgery. The world of media is so strong today and is more attracted when it shows a world of that kind of women. Obviously, woman’s popularity has as a prototype her appearance.
On the other, men’s world is completely different. Men might not attach so the idea that women have for their appearance. Having money or not, men do not develop so much on their looking. The only reason is that men get always attracted by women. They want women to have an attractive appearance, to expand their beauty. According to nature, women should look for themselves with money or not having as an expectation their own beauty and appearance. With that image men then will not look for attractiveness. So, men could understand that it’s woman’s nature to built on such an idea.
To conclude, women’s appearance seems to be a valuable jeweler for them. It might be acoustic as ironic, but it is not. Showing of their beauty, it is the reason to represent as women. Even if they are rich or not, they only know why they devote so much on their beauties. If someone wonders, why women pick up their own interest on having a finery appearance? A woman could answer “ that is woman’s world” so you should accept that “a woman cannot live without all these pleasure things that gives her life.”
Friday, December 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Vasia, I agree with you that woman who belong to the upper social class and that their husbands are important in the society are always well looking and this is because those women are exposed in media everyday and they must be good looking. The issue that none of these women thought about is that they represent one way of how people should view us as women meaning that if I am dressed like Obama’s wife then I show that I am well educated and that I belong in the high social class. But a woman should not be judged by her appearance and a woman should not have this ‘’must’’ in her life, a beautiful woman is not the one that dress and looks nice but is the one who is just be herself
ReplyDeleteMen on the other hand do develop much on their looking and men do not always be attracted by a woman. Men worries for being handsome and attractive. Men do spent lot of money in clothes, gyms and generally in their appearance. So maybe both sexes want to be attractive and good looking what matters is to find out the reason and if it is ‘’in woman’s world’’ to look beautiful then we lost the true meaning of life.
Vasia,I liked your essay.It has a good structure and sequence.Indeed,the issue of a woman's appearence plays a very important role in society.That is due to society's norms.I strongly believe that a person should not be influenced by what society promotes,but support the ideas that truly represent him.I also liked the fact that you made a correlation regarding the Cypriot society.I saw some mistakes regarding the language but that can be improved.Nevertheless, it was a good essay.
ReplyDeleteVasia, to start with, you have used a very structural way for your essay from the start until the ending. You had motion in explaining the topic by using question as well as you refer to the writer and not only. You wrote what the writer’s goal was and what kind of writer is she. I liked that you out quotation marks and the name of the writer before it. You had some grammatical mistakes as in the beginning of the third paragraph you should put comma (,) and not full stop (.) Also I liked that you have used contrast in your essay with other writers, and your phrase “considering the world today, it is appropriate for a woman to be herself in society”. Your essay was very analytical. After all your essay was very good as well as your conclusion.
ReplyDeleteVasia, your essay have a good structure and I liked very much the way that you split your paragraphs. It was very good idea that you add quotations because you empasize some interesting ideas. In your introduction you started by questioning and then you expand it very well. I also liked the fact as Melina said above, the corelation regarding Cypriot society. In your revise essay you can improve your language and it's going to be good enough. The phrase that I liked more is "a woman cannot live without all these pleasure things that gives her life", in your conclusion. By that quotation you made your ending more rich as women wants to be.
ReplyDeleteVasia, out of your essay I realized that you are not in support of the belief that women’s worth should be measured by how beautiful they are, and by how much money they have. You have stated that nicely, especially in the second half of your essay. Making a comparison of women with men on the issue of beauty is an interesting point in your essay. It’s also interesting that you use what Clive James says about Judith Krantz’s work to mention your point of view. I am uncertain though of how to interpret these two sentences of yours: “Every woman wants to keep her beauty in any way so that she will be attracted by men”; “The only reason is that men get always attracted by women”. I don’t know if it’s an incorrect use of passive voice: ‘Every woman wants to keep her beauty in any way so that she will attract men’; ‘The only reason is that men always attract women’, or if I should actually interpret them the way they are. I believe that it would be better if you connect the sentences: “In contrast with Cline James…” and “Specifically, in the latest sector of technology…” with their preceding sentences. I also believe that it would be better if you replaced the word “remain” with ‘preserve’ in “…remain their beauty…”, “develop” with ‘emphasize’ in “…men do not develop so much…”, and “ be acoustic” with ‘sound’ in “It might be acoustic as ironic…”. Vasia, it may seem that my suggestions for amendments are much, but they are actually of minor importance. You wrote a really nice essay. I would like to finish my comments by referring to what I liked the most in your essay which is the sentence “For some people there is a lot of dreaming and for others not”.
ReplyDeleteI liked that the way that Vasia approached the concept of rich people's lifestyle directly - from the very first sentence of her response essay. Vasia clarifies her standpoint that not everyone seeks the same kind of destiny ; that is to say that one's expectations in life often depend on whether they dream about leading a high-class & socially refined life, or if they are simply happy and proud of their personal background without feeling the need to change it. However she made a slight grammatical error in her use of the word
ReplyDelete'good-looking' when trying to emphasize that a woman's beauty is just as important as her ability to move or mingle within certain social circles / classes. Vasia immediately moved on to describe her perception of the book's ("Princess Daisy,") author, who she is convinced, is the epitome of a capitalist, since the former believes that a women's level of success is determined on the basis of whether she has managed to accumulate substantial wealth, along with whether she has sustained a man’s attraction (due to her own prettiness that is). Vasia makes her reader aware of the fact that in this book, Krantz abides loyally to the female archetype, which to her means that each and every ambitious woman in our society ought to aim for and must be intent on seeking a certain air of “aristocracy, glamour, status and success.” I myself agree with the quote by Alex Witchel, since I consider ‘art’ as such, an appropriate way of manipulating and manifesting both one’s interior and outer beauty. I find that this form of iron makes the book a lot more enjoyable, despite the fact that Clive James was critical of it ; probably as a result of his socialist values. Vasia did a good job of analysing James’ stance towards Krantz exaggerated accentuation of female power in the form of beauty and cash. Nevertheless, I found that Vasia provided us with too man details about how much effort women in the modern world put into looking their best (as though they are involved in an ongoing competition), and this in my opinion somehow undermined or clashed with the description of how men treat the issue of their own beauty and upkeep, in the following paragraph.
Vasia, I liked your essay very much.
ReplyDeleteYou show that you have researched your subject a lot before you started writing it. I liked that you mentioned that both Judiths and Clives behaviors are such due to the fact of capitalism and socialism.
You chose to touch upon the subject that every woman in todays world is concerned with;beauty and money, and you made the essay more interesting for me.
Dear Vasia,
ReplyDeleteYour response essay was really enjoyable. I really liked the way you explained women's and men's position in society. Your paragraphs were well-formed and each of it had its own details, BUT as I said to Fotinie, some paragraphs were over-increased. Although, your vocabulary was rich with many interesting words, but you should be careful with your small sentences, for ex. "In contrast with Cline James, who critisizes such an idea". I didn't like the beginning of this sentence.
Also, the phrase I liked most was, "By caring herself, she wins a lot of confidence and looks comfortable through her appearance. She wants to adopt her own image in society". I absolutely agree with you because nowadays women's position looks to be appropriate only through her appearance and this is wrong. So if a woman cares for herself and supports herself, she can feel confidence.
To conclude, in general perspective, your essay was interested to be read and I assume that through your revision the essay will be even more better. Your writing skills are seem to be really good, but with more effort it will be better.
Thanks.
Vasia I liked your essay very much it was more than a good structured essay, the fact that you expanded your subject in relation with other aspects it made your essay even stronger and more completed. First of all your introduction was clear enough so the reader to understand that the essay is about how each person sees the high and low social class. Second of all I must say that I also liked the way you portrayed Judith Krantz and Cline James you did a really good job in describing both characters. As I have aforementioned above I liked the fact that you expanded the subject of women in high social class according to the technology , for example “for those who have the money and really want to change something for their appearance, technology is a solution”. Also according to the media for example “the world of media is so strong today and is more attracted when it shows a world of that kind of women”. Furthermore the stronger parts in your essay are the parts where you expand the main theme in relation with Cyprus because you help the reader to associate himself/herself with the text. The other strong part of your essay is the comparison that you did with men. In general you covered most of the aspects that you could use to expand your subject, the only thing that you should bare in mind while revising your essay are some grammatical mistakes.
ReplyDelete